MedWAR, also known as the Medical Wilderness Adventure Race, is a competition that combines wilderness medicine and racing. Teams of four compete to see who can finish first. The teams will have put their minds together and find solutions to the many medical scenarios constructed throughout a course, which involves running, hiking, biking, and canoeing. MedWAR is an annual event created and coordinated by Medical College of Georgia students and emergency medicine physicians. Now in its thirteenth year, it has expanded to a series of races in the US and Canada.
I’m one of the administrative directors for the race this year, which means I’m in charge of advertising & helping plan the medical scenarios (which are Awesome by the way). Pass this along to anyone who is interested or let me know if you are!!
Special note to the anon docs/med students I follow: You guys are amazing and I respect your anonymity. Feel free to sign up / email me and let me know you are interested. No need to let me know how you heard about it or let me know your alias, I just want you to enjoy the race!!
Contact me @ lsimmons1@gru.edu if you’re interested!!
A note: Anyone can participate :) So bring it on.
More info bellow the cut:
Y’know, if this event was happening just 19 days sooner, I would DEFINITELY attend. (Or at least claim to…)
10 part-time clinical jobs for American MD’s looking to make some extra cash. (I’m posting this PRIMARILY to point out that in today’s economy, even us “rich golf-playing Porsche-driving” doctors are scraping to make ends meet).
(I already do #1, and I think I’d enjoy doing 2, 7, 9, and 10)
thuc:
Finally !
Here’s the news I’ve been aching to tell you all about.
I teamed up with ObizMedia to create this infographic about physician salaries and costs of education (financial and time related). It’s been under wraps for a few months now and is finally ready for release!
Head over to my blog, MD Salaries for more information.
Enjoy!
update: reposting this as a photo post for easier viewing for my tumblr readers.
Great infographic is great. In summary: don’t go into medicine if you wanna get rich.
I dont usually relate real life MD’s to fictional Tv series doctors. But I was curious to know can/are some doctors as really cynical,cold and aloof as Dr, Cox, Kelso, and House? If their are Dr. like this what got them to that point, and is it permanent/reversible? -illegallyawesome
Of course there are doctors like this. I think the big difference between the real life guys and the tv docs is that the real life guys (hopefully) don’t show their cynicism as blatantly to their patients.
How do doctors become cold and cynical? Personally I think they start out with a little of that in them already, and then it just grows through their career. I constantly hear snide remarks about patients in the “behind the scenes” times in the hospital. I know fellow residents, attendings, and students who very clearly hate patient care, yet they’ve chosen a profession that requires them to interact with people all the time. I’m not sure why people do this.
If money is your goal, be a businessperson. If it’s prestige, do research and win the Nobel. If you love science but hate working with people, work in a lab. Get a PhD. Be a non-clinical physician. Don’t be a doctor if you don’t like dealing with people.
Accurate post is accurate.
Dear Colleague,
Earlier this week Gov. Rick Perry sent a letter to US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and stated that Texas is opposed to the expansion of Medicaid as provided in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and to creating a state insurance exchange. This announcement came on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the PPACA.
Both decisions affect Texans as many Texans depending on government-funded health insurance face a crisis in access to health care. The problem is that having coverage is not the same as having access, and access to a waiting list is not access to health care. Handcuffed by stifling regulations and money-losing reimbursement levels, an accelerating number of physicians have stopped accepting new patients who have government-funded health insurance — Medicaid and Medicare. Only 31 percent of Texas physicians accept new Medicaid patients. The negative trajectory of this number is just as alarming, having been 42 percent in 2010. In Dallas County the numbers for 2012 are even more bleak — just 24 percent of physicians accept new Medicaid patients. At this rate you have to wonder when the acceptance rate for our county will fall into the teens, or if we will actually see single digits. Since 2010, the percentage of Texas physicians accepting new Medicare patients fell from 66 percent to 58 percent. In regard to dual-eligible (Medicare-Medicaid) patients, 40 percent of physicians statewide and 32 percent in Dallas County accept them. Coupled with the potential negative impact of the Medicaid 1115 Waiver on hospital reimbursement for low-income patients, we could be facing a devastating perfect storm of decreasing patient access.
This is why the proposed expansion in Texas of the Medicaid program under the PPACA by itself is not the answer for uninsured and low-income patients. Why expand coverage in an insurance plan that has shockingly limited and unacceptable access to care? This simply gives false hope to the 25 percent of our fellow citizens who are uninsured that their participation in the Medicaid program will dramatically improve their ability to access the healthcare system. We need a plan that expands coverage and access to care.
The gold standard for this access must embody timely access to quality, cost-effective care. A key ingredient of this expansion of access is the streamlining of the oppressive and progressively costly regulatory process so we physicians can devote more of our time to caring for patients and less to caring for paperwork. Paperwork never healed anyone. Improving patient access to health care also must involve increasing physician reimbursement to viable levels where we do not face the prospect of paying out of our pockets for every Medicaid patient we see. By working with our legislators and congressional representatives, we physicians can have a significant impact in improving access to the healthcare system for the uninsured of our state. We physicians must be forceful advocates for our patients. However, we should not put the cart before the horse. Instead of initially expanding coverage to the uninsured of our state to an overly flawed and ineffective insurance system, we should first concentrate our efforts on improving actual access to care through the Medicaid plan we currently have in place. Let’s get to work.
Sincerely,
Richard W. Snyder II, MD
President
Dallas County Medical Society
I bolded the statements that I feel are particularly overlooked in the whole Obama Care kerfuffle. For more physician opinions on PPACA, including my own, see my Obama Care tag.
Seeing a doctor for the first time can be extremely stressful, especially for health veterans that know what to expect and what makes a good doctor good, but have already been through traumatic experiences with health care workers. It’s stressful enough to find Dr. Right in the first place and…
This article contains an excellent summary of the various options available for patients to file complaints/feedback about negative experiences with a physician/healthcare provider. It’s written by Chronic Curve, who has (unfortunately) had EXTENSIVE experience with sub-par doctors during her struggles with multiple chronic and mysterious medical conditions.
So a physician Cranquistador from Chicago was telling me about this CPR training service (that she herself has used for training her office staff), and I figured I’d pass along the news:
The “Learn CPR Chicago” CPR training program will be holding a FREE 2-hour CPR certification course this coming Saturday July 14 at 12:00pm CST. It is open to anyone interested in learning healthcare-level CPR: high school students, pre-med students, any adults in general.
Contact the program through the website or through the program’s Facebook page for more details.
Hey, free is good!
whimsicalfirefly submitted:
HI! With the heart of Obama’s health care reform ruled as constitutional just now, I was curious how you think this will affect doctors?
Oh joy a question about politics I cannot contain my excitement.

(Nothing personal! I just hate politics. So this reply will be short.)
First, let’s get the term straight: The Affordable Care Act (aka Obama Care) is not healthcare reform, it’s healthcare insurance reform. And you can (attempt to) fix the insurance system all you want, but until you fix the healthcare system itself, costs will continue to skyrocket and reimbursement will not be able to keep up.
Second: read this prior post where I discuss my main objections to the ACA, plus what I think would really need to change in the US healthcare system for actual healthcare reform.
Lastly: read the reblogged posts under my Obama Care tag, particularly the excellent posts by WayfaringMD and Jay Parkinson, for more MD perspectives on the issue.

By popular demand (aka Cranquis asked so nicely and I had to oblige) here is the previous post in re-blog-friendly format!hi, why do you want to be a doctor? other than prestige and money________________________________________________________Hi there, ramennekko!
I’m going to answer your question in 3, THREE parts! Because you bring up what I believe to be three critical components to this classic question that really needs to change. So I’m glad you brought this up!
So this post is part 1 of 3 of my answer to you.
My personal opinion is that NO ONE SHOULD GO INTO MEDICINE FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF GAINING PRESTIGE OR MONEY. Do what you love, and those things tend to follow…

If you are considering becoming a doctor, you NEED to read this post (and probably the next 2 posts in the series, which md-admissions hasn’t even posted yet, but which will probably be just as unabashedly AWESOME as this post is.) It is full of Truth.
docbear commented on THIS post (about limitations on physicians working in the field as EMT’s):
In regards to an EM physician working on a rig, it is not an unheard of practice, but it is fairly uncommon. The main reason is that the EM physician has a skill set that is most effectively utilized in the setting of an emergency department. We can function in the field, however, most would be at a disadvantage there. Most of the things that we can do better than a medic out in the field (their environment) would be done in the ED (our environment).
On occasion, there are times when a physician would be beneficial in the field. I am thinking of the emergent amputation in order to facilitate extrication from an accident. An on-site emergency physician *could* be of some benefit at the scene of a mass-causalty incident, however, we would be of the greatest help to the patients by being in our environment.
Most of the EM physicians that I know that still run on a rig were EMTs/Medics once upon a time. Most would function to the level of their malpractice coverage. It is a sad fact, but we live in society of litigation and that determines what is done at times. As GarrettMccarthy wrote, there usually a set of protocols used by EMTs/Medics written by their Medical Director (known henceforth as “Doc A”). Doc A bears the liability if something goes wrong with the medics under him.
The EM physican on the rig (known henceforth as “Doc B”), will have 2 choices. If Doc B doesn’t want liability, then he/she would have to follow the protocols established by Doc A and function as a Medic. Doc B has a second option. If the rig’s online medical control (the “go-to” people on the radio for answers that aren’t covered by protocols) gives the OK, Doc B could assume direct medical control. That would allow Doc B pretty much free reign to do what he/she wants to do in the field, but it comes at a cost. By assuming direct medical control, they also assume liability. That is something that most EM physician’s malpractice insurance wouldn’t cover.
Where am I going with this? Good question! (mental note: Don’t try for insightful answers after getting off of a 10 hour flight).
The short answer is: the EM physician on a rig would function as an EMT and follow established protocols if they don’t want so assume liability. If they are willing to assume liability, then they can function as an EM physician in the field.
Now THAT makes sense to me. Thank you so much!
EMT QUESTION
There’s a topic that’s being debated by my EMS Squad, and I figured I’d ask your opinion:
If someone is acting as an EMT, but they have certifications beyond it, in what capacity should they act when we’re called to a patient? It’s come up with two different specific questions: there is someone on our squad who’s certified as a paramedic. Should they be giving aid to the patient as a paramedic, or as an EMT, when they’re on our EMT Rescue squad?
The original question was when I told my day lieutenant I was pre-med and my long term goal was to become an ER Physician. She said “great, we’ll have a doctor on call!” To which the night lieutenant said “no, she’ll still be an EMT.” Who is right? If you’ve been trained well beyond an EMT’s certification, like (long in the future) when I have my MD, but you’re responding as an EMT, do you fall to your training level or your “responding level”?
Oh geez. This is a tough question. I think the “proper” answer would probably vary, depending on many factors (local and state laws, institutional policies, the complexity of the patient’s medical needs, the hard-assed-ness of the EMT’s bosses).
But I have to admit: I’ve never heard of an ER doc still working out in the field as an EMT. I just don’t see the point. Sure, ER docs would have the free time to do so, since a typical ER doc works in shift-schedules which leave a lot of time to pursue other interests — but he/she would be so over-qualified and under-paid (relative to what you make in a real ER job) that it wouldn’t be worth his/her time to show up for the job (to put it bluntly). But perhaps I’m wrong — I’m Family-Medicine trained and only work in an Urgent Care, after all, so I don’t know much about how the ER docs like to roll. :)
PS: Holy Toledo, it took me 2 months to reply to your question. I am so sorry!
***Pending Cranquis-Mails: 1; Inbox: Closed — and now that TumblrMSG no longer exists, I’m really not sure what I’m going to use for the next Open Inbox session.***
cranquis replied to your post: wordsthatididntsay replied to your post:…
There ya go — you’re a TOAD now. :)
I need to go medical school STAT just so I can use that picture
Well I don’t see why this (obviously cool and super-elite) group couldn’t be called the TOADS: “Tumblr Organization of Anonymous Doctors (and also medical) Students”? Just need a better picture for the concept. *crappy photoshop powers ACTIVATE*

If that category applies to your Tumblr, congratulations: You’re a TOAD. :) Heck, it could even apply to pre-med blogs — I’m not picky.
Good question, but I don’t know the answer, Ink Panther. I guess it would depend on the overall “environment” of your potential employer — are the administrators more liberal or conservative? What is their target population? Do they already employ other tattooed physicians or staff?
Your choices of radiology or pathology would entail less direct patient contact than other specialties, so I think you’ll have less issues convincing an employer to hire you “despite” your “potentially patient-frightening” tattoos. In a perfect world, employers would judge you on your performance and not your appearance — but healthcare companies place a lot of stock on (real and imagined) “public perception”, and some of them might subtly discriminate against you because of your tats. I don’t know that for sure, though.
Good luck, (and thanks! The family is doing pretty well, now that Baby Cranquis is back to sleeping through the night again!) :)
***Pending Cranquis-Mails: 20***